seems impossible to be against the campaign. Enough blood, enough violence, enough death. The country can not get used to hearing the report of death like the weather warning. We can not tolerate this mad rush of violence and savagery. More and more dead but also, increasingly arrogant criminal, terrorism increasingly intimidating.
course: we need to end the violence that is bleeding the country, which fills us with fear, threatening to plunge us into barbarism. We need to escape from this circle blood if we lose a generation of Mexico. But behind an undeniable theme presents an unacceptable reading: The problem we suffer is of unique shape of the government. President Calderón is the cause of a costly war and it alone must declare an immediate ceasefire. He invented a war and stop him playing. The "Enough" directs the Government, not the criminals!
What he calls? To cease hostilities against the criminals? Do you agree with them? To cede the land they consider theirs? To ask for an apology? The surfeit of violence can actually hatching a dangerous temptation: to reach concluded that the costs of confrontation are so high that it is better to stop fighting with the criminals.
negotiate with criminals for the sake of peace. That is what we read between the lines when it comes to end immediately with "Calderon's war," when one considers that the responsible Mexican violence are not the kidnappers, drug dealers, thugs, the decapitated, the extortionists but the federal government that has faced since the beginning of this administration. We are losing sight of the basics: organized crime, not the government, is responsible for the violence they suffer. If we demand an end to violence should direct our call for bands criminals, not to President Calderón.
The President Calderón must demand that complies with the law. Nothing less but more than legality: results. So you have to chase the criminals, but do so effectively. Punish the crime is a primary obligation of the State. Failure to do so, as was done for a long time, is to invite cancer into our lungs to sleep, thinking that, by signing an agreement, the cancer will comply with the cough. I have no doubt that President Calderon was right to deal with organized crime from the start of his administration. I had to. His strategy, however, may be questionable. In light of their results as is, without doubt. Did not emerge from a realistic analysis of the problem, or know the reliability of their resources. It has not worked and, in many respects, has worsened the problem.
But Felipe Calderon did not invent the insecurity that has already reached dramatic levels during the administration of Vicente Fox's occupation of Michoacán was not a product of his imagination, the decomposition of Ciudad Juárez is preceded by many years, the military buildup, economic and political drugs are not propaganda farce to justify a war. Against organized crime had no choice: we had to face him. To meet them, of course, there were other options. But it was not possible to close our eyes to an enemy that was made of the territory, which decided in many places that the public press, which had a monstrous arsenal, which corrupts and controls large parts of the state.
The President Calderón must demand that is driven responsibly and intelligently. We must demand accountability and, above all, results. The Government should pursue organized crime with the instruments of law and only with them. There is no justification for abuse, for the violation of human rights. But we can not mistake the focus of our outrage. If we are unwilling to accept death as an everyday scenario, we better who locate the causes. Not the government. They are criminals. It seems elementary common sense, begins to escape us.
Let's not play either with the idea of \u200b\u200bmoral equivalence: as bad as each other. Do not lose the basic sense: the villains who kidnap and intimidate, maim and kill those who are criminals. That the government of Felipe Calderón has politicized irresponsibly fighting organized crime, which has been ineffective in its action, that insecurity has worsened significantly in his administration does not negate the central fact: the biggest threat in Mexico is organized crime. The country has no future if it can not defeat the criminals. Therefore the Government will have to persevere in their fight against the violent. Should reconsider their strategy, refocus their priorities but should not withdraw its basic mandates: to recover for all peace.
Jesus Silva-Herzog Márquez
http://blogjesussilvaherzogm.typepad.com/
+++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++
The real culprits are the narco HDSRPM, crime organized. Governments, especially the Federal Government will cause this. Governments of the three levels, Federal, state and municipal, are responsible for providing security and reduce crime. You have to criticize, we must demand that fulfill their responsibility, their pay retribution. That refine the police, who no longer spent on image and you invest in security. But that's to say that the 35 thousand dead in 4 years is the fault of the Federal government, is a long way.
Dany Portales
0 comments:
Post a Comment