Melina Velba Gallerry

Thanks to research by The North shot the myth (he himself) that Nuevo León surcharges paid by its debt due to an increase in their level of risk.

has been shown that with the same level of risk (AAA) and issued at exactly the same historical moment, Nuevo León hired for her debt by paying substantially more interest than other stations in the same circumstances.

consistently and repeatedly state government debt contracted more expensive than anyone else, which can only indicate two things about who handled the finances of Nuevo Leon in this period:

1 .- O were very inept negotiate o. .. 2 .-

to vices were provided with financial intermediaries.

very reliable sources who know the number OPAQUE Treasury estimate that Nuevo Leon state pays per year HUNDRED and twenty million dollars extra by way of surcharges on its debt.

That is, you SACA citizens BAG 130 million pesos a month to give to the financial intermediaries who are pocketing the "extra" between what should be the correct rate and paid higher than New lion.

Usually in these debt placement operations intermediaries manage a system of "commissions."

Logic assumption is that somehow these surcharges, these billions of dollars a year, are divided between brokers and officers who signed them "carte blanche" from the people.

That is, first create a money bag, which is the "spread" between what you should pay and what is actually paid, and this surplus is shared.

This means that "someone", which IS NOT THE PEOPLE OF NUEVO LEON-profits with this scheme of surcharges from the PEOPLE.

said, saying although the former treasurer and current Senator of the Republic, Fernando Elizondo, that the issue of surcharges to pay on its debt Nuevo León should be investigated. For

assumption that it should be!

Only those who put together these tricks, which could well be described as a deviation, was also ordered to leave in their lid. Therefore

opacity! Thus

refused to disclose the specifics of the debt, because they know there is dirt! Dirt

causing hot flashes to the "Godfather" and the party that aims to bring the "tufts" Peña to the presidency.

why the aim to sweep under the carpet protective mantle have tended to OPAC, which in turn becomes one of complicity.

should be noted that this data could investigate their newspaper cover only Nuevo León debt placed through the bag. A titipuchal

amount of debt of Nuevo León placed directly with the Bank, which is completely hidden, and here it is assumed there is still more dirt than what has already appeared.

expensive debt with "spreads" incomprehensible that benefit only the provider institution and its representatives, who through the old practice of "Moche" allegedly returning to their benefactors a LOT OF MONEY "extra" that diverted from state coffers.

Each month, this jet wool with sophisticated financial SIPHON will extract into the coffers PUBLIC PRIVATE benefits rather than serving to meet the needs of the population who are neither few nor insignificant.

Then, in the hope that this local authority and its representatives have no interest in uncovering the least compromise and rectify the misappropriation, you may have to be the Superior Audit of the Federation to intervene, investigate and punish evil use of public funds, not only for the alleged embezzlement, but also jeopardize the economic future of the state to benefit individuals, and almost certainly public officials who passed these borrowing schemes and harmful HARMFUL in the short and long term.


Village Attorney fricase@elnorte.com

+++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++

And this we see happening in all NL states. Now the governors are small feudal lords who spent the Treasury in full opacity, with corruption, excessive bureaucracy, and well-fed a vicious cycle to perpetuate the group in power and personal enrichment on the road.

Bath Salts After Waxing

Comercial Mexicana

Now you have the summary of the best deals at the Comercial Mexicana for the month of February.

Wide variety of chocolates from $ 12.00
The purchase of 2 drinks ADES you get a free box of bars Stila strawberry 150g
When buying a bag of granola Quaker you get free 1 kg of banana tabasco
Cloralex clothing Color Power vinegar from $ 14.90
package soaps 4 pieces Shield to $ 26.75
Pantiliners Kotex of 22 pieces $ 9.00
petal toilet paper Rendimax of 12 rolls $ 82.60
Dog Food Pet's Club from 10 kg to only $ 99.90
dog food Pets Club from 20kg to $ 199.90
Dog Beds from $ 149.00
25% bonus on the wallet Chow Dog Food Online
Champion Purina Dog 2kg only $ 45.00 Adult
pedigree complete nutrition
13kg to $ 216.00 for 180ml Moisturizing Cream Etam
to $ 9.00 Pantene Shampoo 500 ml. at $ 36.00 3-Pack
bar soaps 150 gr c / ua
Charmin $ 17.95 12 pieces $ 85.95 discounted to $ 69.95

Be sure to visit your nearest Eating to exploit these and other great promotions.

Best Rock Love Song 80s

media violence

(16 February 2011) .- When the earthquake occurred September 1985 in Mexico City, the information disseminated many ways reminded that the city was destroyed.

remember a friend's family flew to Mexico from Colombia, recording in his luggage ropes, hundreds of water purification tablets and equipment for climbing. The images broadcast media broadcast footage again and again collapsed buildings and people affected, convinced them that they would arrive at a city in ruins and it must be prepared to help their loved ones. Big surprise

received when leaving the airport found that the taxi that took almost moved throughout the city, and that although there was significant damage, they were recorded in specific areas. In the context of the tragedy that was the earthquake, a sector of the population was organized in support and rescue work for several days, while the remainder, ie the vast Most, soon resumed their daily activities.

The story may sound droll, but it was true. Why mention it? Because something similar happens with the way some media bombard us morning, noon and night with notes on the violence and insecurity that occur in our city and country.

Under his view, it seems that no other events and activities noteworthy than the assault, shootings, kidnappings or confrontation between criminal groups.

If this view prevails among us, a similar image is projected abroad: Mexico is a narco-state or quasi-failed to fall in claws of organized crime. No man's land, a land of violence, it is dangerous to travel to that nation.

Not only that, today is the international perception is that Mexicans are a people traffickers, drug addicts and thugs. If prior to the current situation of undocumented migrants in the U.S. were deemed illegal, now lies with them the stigma of criminal indisputable.

is sad to admit, but these days carry a passport from Mexico and is no guarantee of good citizenship. Before the world, any Mexican tourist can be considered a potential criminal.

abuse by some means of magnifying the news focus on crime is producing the effect of "backfire." A force to highlight only the dimension of violence and insecurity, minimizing the information otherwise, it generates fear, discourages investments and promotes an audience that feeds on the morbid, the shock and fear, instead of contributing become a critical public and documented.

you had the opportunity to listen to a radio and television evening news Monterrey in which, to report any criminal act, not only addresses the issue to death, but reading the note is accompanied by an audio reproduces the wail of sirens to cause concern at the hearing?

When some see the rating means as an end in itself and not as a tool to improve the quality of information, the huge untapped potential in the building of a free citizenry, gravitational and democratic.

In his book "A World Without Meaning", the political philosopher Laïdi Zaki said the grave responsibility that had the media in the escalation and spread of the bloody war in Bosnia in 1992-1995. Another author, Ken Robinson, also acknowledges in the book "Out of Our Minds", the need for the news industry to produce news 24 hours a day to capture the public's attention and keep rating.

one thing to be aware and report objectively, and other nurturing the curiosity and exaggerate the news for reasons of ill-gained popularity. Lucrecia Lozano


lucrecialozano@itesm.mx

++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++

Do not try to hide the sun with a finger. We definitely have a serious problem of insecurity in Mexico. There are areas in the country that are very dangerous. Juarez is the most dangerous city in the world is the rate of homicides per 100 thousand inhabitants world's highest. However, the vast majority of Mexicans make our life almost as normal. Come every day to work, to school. We're buying groceries. On weekends we go to malls, shopping, movies.

Obviously we take precautions. Dens, turns black, mostly their clients have been significantly diminished. Many have changed their profile by changing the car or home. But the violence that the media convey if it is exaggerated. The shootings and executions, although alarming, they have little effect on the general population. If innocent people have been killed, by stray bullets or confusion, but are the least. The vast majority of the dead are still among the ranks of criminals, police and armed forces members.

violence, insecurity, if directly affects the general public is the increase in auto theft, and kidnappings, which are still going well. Both crimes of common law they are supposed to prosecute and punish the state government, and prevent municipalities.

But let us not be victimized by a monopoly of the negative information. There are a lot of positive feedback that we are not receiving and worth crowing. All Mexicans should start sending out more positive information. Brazil is worse security than Mexico and yet receives so much negative review from abroad. We begin with ourselves, Mexicans, to do so.

Greetings

Dany Portales

Triple Beam Balanceworksheet

Inks Equity

violence this gives us new eyes to look at the violence of the past. That is the feeling that makes "José Clemente Orozco. Painting and truth", the exhibition coordinated by Miguel Cervantes in San Ildefonso. Among its many surprises, the formidable portraits welcome, the harsh, uncomfortable but hilarious cartoons antimaderistas, fierce and tender watercolors of life brothel, sits a series of small paintings in ink and pencil originally titled "Horrors of revolution. "

are part of a group of fifty or sixty works Orozco started painting shortly before his second departure from Mexico to the United States (November 1927) until about 1930, when the success of these inks and lithographs of his subsequent beat contracts of its three famous murals in the country: Pomona, College New School for Social Research and Dartmouth College.

The genesis of these drawings are curious. Knowing that he had withdrawn to continue Orozco murals in high school, and critical journalist Anita Brenner, one of the great literary love Mexico and pretended to an American collector was interested in drawings that the artist had begun to carry on their memories of the Revolution.

Orozco gave some of them and went to New York, where she had no time to regret the ruse because, warned by Brenner, Alma Reed, the famous "Pilgrim", another passion of Mexico would take in more of a sense under his mantle, promoting his work among wealthy friends, exhibitions and even in the Delphic Studios Gallery, which would open for that purpose.

Since his arrival, after settling on the Upper West Side, Orozco continued to represent vividly the images he had witnessed around 1915 in Orizaba, while working in La Vanguardia, the journal of the famous "Red Battalions", directed by "Dr. Atl.

In his "Autobiography" Orozco left over that experience memorable paragraphs: "The tragedy tore everything around us. Troops were on the tracks to the slaughter. The trains were blown up. The shot on the porch of the parish unhappy pawns Zapatistas that Prisoners of the Carranza fell. It used to killing people, the most ruthless selfishness, the glut of senses, pure animality and openly. Small populations were robbed and committed all sorts of excesses. Trains coming from the battlefields in the station emptied Orizaba its cargo of troops wounded and tired, exhausted, shattered, sweaty, ragged. "

in San Ildefonso inks display this cruel reality that achieved revolutionary myth smooth and even ennobling. A hanged hanging from a pole while two men sleep with their rifles, a treacherous knife (picture repeated in Orozco) has pierced the breast of a naked woman lying under a maguey with her husband, an unfortunate pawn EZLN an eerie procession follows the bed of a shot, in a precarious hospital room, including weeping women and ragged blankets are piled the wounded, maimed, blindfolded, blinded, dying, guns and knives in the "Battle" are prefiguring of "Guernica" in several other categories ("Tears" and "War") the main characters are Mexican women who cover their grief with their shawls, prostrate, kneeling , pleading, resigned. Orozco

infinitely gracious of them but not idealize the "people." They often depicted as the noisy carnival of generalote murderer, surrounded by soldiers obstinate and panting whores.

Among all inks, two particularly impressed me: "Rape", which occurs in a bedroom mirror and shattered furniture, where a revolutionary cascorvo, after satisfying his appetite, fits awkwardly pants while another begins his brutal act on the same, desperate woman, and "The Return", perhaps the most poignant for its key Rulfo theme: a man returns home to report to two women, maybe his mother and his sister's death of a loved one who has only been a theft of clothing.

What was the source close to their sensitivity to pain? At age 21, an experiment with gunpowder had exploded in his hand, and to prevent gangrene was decided to amputate. In the commemorative book of the exhibition is an excellent test that recovers Tibol Raquel Orozco harrowing testimony about his physical limitations, "everything, absolutely everything, I have to do with one hand!". Had anticipated the revolution in his own body.

will say that revolutionary violence was lucid, social, heroic. It will say that those hundreds of thousands of deaths (and their widows and orphans) chose that destination to redeem a country mired in poverty, injustice, inequality or oppression. Was it really so? Orozco's vision (As in "Los de Abajo", a novel illustrated by these dates) Revolution was not the lush, idyllic utopia Rivera, and the dynamic Siqueiros historic ascent, but the drama of a good people killed in an incomprehensible, loud and wild "party of bullets."

will say that the current violence is not lucid, socially or heroic. It's true. But will the mythology of the Revolution planted among us a disregard for life that went dormant (placated by a vast and efficient system of domination, not by a genuine rule of law) to emerge again in our time. Many things built in the 20th century but not a culture of legality, which was the backbone of Mexico liberal. Therefore, the ending of the monopoly of power (where restoration is undesirable and perhaps impossible), we returned to the source: violent minorities delivered "to the killing, the most ruthless selfishness, the glut of senses, pure animality and openly ".

When we get out? When the law and justice take root among us, when the majority harboring peaceful, silent and suffering, where respect reigns of individual life.

Enrique Krauze

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

For those who believe that he had never experienced violence as now. Even with all the crime we have, our generation lives better than ever before.

Whenever I am more convinced that the Revolution was the worst thing that could have happened to this country. Mexico undoubtedly had many problems with Porfirio Díaz, urging democratic change, and only with an armed uprising could topple him. But what happened between 1913 and 1920 was a disaster. The remedy was worse than the disease. Would take almost 30 years for productivity in 1910 the country had recovered. To give an idea of \u200b\u200bthe magnitude, the recent crisis in late 2008 that lasted a whole year, 2009, we need only one year, 2010, to regain the previous level.

Y Revolution took a dictator, but only to bring us another dictatorship that lasted over 70 years and still we still hanging with governors who use public money for personal gain and his group. And a Congress, a party-that do not release the power and form a monopoly that restricts participation. What served the revolution then? It's just a myth created by the PRI to justify their hold on power.

Kinesio Taping Bunions

The dictionary of the Royal English Language Academy provides five definitions of the concept of fairness: (Del lat. Aequitas,-atis).

1. f. Equanimity.

2. f. Temperance usual kind. Propensity to be guided, or fail, the sense of duty or conscience, rather than by the strict requirements of justice or by the final text of the law.

3. f. Natural justice, as opposed to the letter of the positive law.

4. f. Moderation in the price of things, or conditions of contracts.

5. f. Disposition of the spirit that moves to give everyone his due.

The concept, as you can see, it is not necessary. Its use in the Constitution and electoral law can be understood only the last meaning. But a double question immediately arises: what is it that everyone deserves?, And who determines it?

The answer is simple: legislators-that is, the parties, which established that 30 percent of state resources (budget and time on electronic media) is distributed equally and 70 percent in proportion to the vote of each party. Why

30-70 and not 50-50 or 70-30? Because yes, they decided to legislators. In fact, this proportion does not contribute to the contenders match, or improve the conditions of competition for the kids. It is evident that gives more who else has and these resources are used to preserve inequality.

Is it inappropriate for the legislation provides that proportion? No, but you can not say that a law is fair or perfect. Is one option among many that has advantages and disadvantages. Nothing more.

So far things are relatively simple. The state's relations with the parties to govern by that principle, for better or worse, it works. The other option would be to treat everyone equally and give them the same resources.

Would the end of the world? No. But such a scheme would never be approved by a majority of legislators belonging to parties more strong, since it would hurt their interests. That's the bottom line.

The great confusion in regard to equity is elsewhere. Lawmakers asked the following question in 1996: how to ensure that a third person or entity, do not purchase time on radio and TV and use it to serve some political forces?

estatólatras The response was very simple: ban the purchase of those particular spaces.

And to drive home the point, the ban was constitutional rank in 2007.

The problem is that equality is a vague concept and can not become a touchstone democracy. Can and should function as a criterion for regular party-state relations, but not as a value to restrict and limit the actions of citizens.

The law establishes a clear division between authorities and citizens. The authority can do exclusively what the law entitles him. Citizens, however, can do everything that is not prohibited or punished by the law.

equity to a similar principle applies. One thing is that the state assume the equity as a guiding principle and another is to limit and abridging civil liberties to impose it. The dial-party state has its own logic and should not interfere in space-liberties-rights citizens.

Why? For two reasons. The core values \u200b\u200bof democracy (freedom, equality), which involve basic rights for all citizens, should not be equated with a principle that governs the electoral competition between citizens' organizations.

promote equity is a state obligation, but that responsibility does not confer the right to hurt the essential liberties to achieve this "ideal state", which is pretty relative. Exemplified. There can be no democracy without political parties and electoral competition-direct democracy, "but never could've without freedom of expression and equality.

In addition, the effect of the ban is real create first-class citizens, organized games with time on radio and television-and second-class citizens, whose only sin is not to join a party, without the right to be heard or seen in the electronic media.

There are, moreover, a basic consideration. Prohibit the purchase of time on electronic media in the era of the internet is stupid. The information now more than ever, it is horizontal and increasingly free.

estatólatras So if the legislature take the spirit of another law should be developed to regulate and control the contents of the network. The IFE acquire, then, the power to punish all those citizens who use Twitter or Facebook to influence other citizens at election time.

Finally, it is regrettable to note the intellectual poverty of our debate. Several of the advocates of electoral counter 2007 we announced the end of the campaign spotización. A profesorcillo went even further. Condemned the empty spots as a form of communication.

To our misfortune, spotización of politics has reached, thanks to the electoral-degree counter ideotización never seen before. But fortunately for us, young men from the "spoiled ballot" showed how ingenious, brilliant and rich, which may be a spot on the network.

I conclude by paraphrasing the Great Helmsman: at all times, including elections, a thousand flowers bloom. Jaime Sanchez Susarrey

++++++++++++++++++++++++

URGE to move from the current party-a real democracy. For it is essential that there are independent candidates, re-bounded, 2nd row, easy creation of political parties but at the local level in districts and municipalities. And above all, reduced public funding for political parties. That are its members who support them with adequate control to prevent money from crime, but nothing more.