Train Simulator Online

"The rich who have mansions by the sea should not receive government subsidies." Geraldo Rivera

media call it "gasolinazo" because they seek to pressure the government to suspend the adjustments in the price of gasoline. In my view, however, these increases are modest and should gradually rise.

This past May 14 Magna gasoline rose 8 cents to fetch 9.16 pesos per liter. Is an increase of 0.72 percent. It can hardly be called a "gasolinazo" even though the increase is the fifth year. Assuming that the price of Magna climbed 8 cents per month for 12 months, rising would amount to about 96 cents, 8.7 percent above the level of 09.08 pesos per liter in April.

More than this increase, which lags far behind the increases that have occurred in the world, I am concerned that the Government was doing damage to the environment and the economy of the poorest Mexicans with a petrol subsidy of 100 billion pesos in the 2011, three times what was originally planned for this year.

The main damage done by subsidizing gasoline is also promoting greater use of this fuel. The advanced countries have had to pay higher prices for gasoline in recent years due to increasing crude oil prices and this has served to significantly reduce the use of gasoline. One consequence is the reduction of emissions of air pollutants at a time when this is considered essential to reduce global warming.

Mexico has been in the opposite direction and becoming more pollution. In 2006, according to figures from Pemex, the country sold 601 000 Magna 800 barrels of gasoline each day. March 2011 reached a level of 755 thousand 200 barrels per day. This is an increase of 25 percent in just five years in gasoline cheaper and more polluting. This increase automatically cancels all that the Government is making efforts to reduce carbon emissions to atmosphere.

The problem of gasoline subsidies, however, is not limited to pollution. In fact, this subsidy represents a regressive transfer of resources from poorer to richer.

More than 40 percent of the population of our country lives in poverty. A very high percentage in this group is completely devoid of its own assets. In fact, his only real wealth is the part you played in the country's oil resources, which supposedly belong equally to all Mexicans.

Instead of receiving dividends as shareholders, Pemex could be distributed among the Mexicans, which do more to help you have less, the Treasury Department is using 100 billion dollars of income from oil monopoly, three times what it spent on the Ministry of Public Security, to subsidize motorists, who represent 20 percent richer society .

One of the reasons why Mexico has so many poor people is that we have built a hacienda system that robs the poor to subsidize the rich. In the case of gasoline subsidies that transfer is not only extremely regressive, but also fills the skies of pollution. Far from challenging the modest increases in the price of gasoline, we should demand a true gasolinazo, leading prices of the fuel to levels currently prevailing in our trading partners. Tenure


Eruviel Avila, the PRI candidate to the State Government of Mexico, promised to eliminate vehicular tenure if he wins the election next July 3. This joins a populist and regressive. Remove the holding means those who can not buy a car to subsidize the services that are provided to motorists, much more prosperous than they are. Sergio Sarmiento


www.sergiosarmiento.com

+++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + +

Subsidizing gasoline as the zero rate on food and medicine is the worst injustice that makes the Mexican tax system against the poor. Unfortunately a group of populist demagogues, especially the PRI, PRD and PT, continue to press for such subsidies remain widespread. A general allowance has the most benefits, not the poor. Subsidies should be directly not widespread.

gasolinazo And if we speak, the PRI did in the 70's, 80's and 90's these if they were gasolinazo. With increases of 30, 50 and up to 100% overnight for another, without warning. Now they are small, and throughout the year do not reach even 10%. And yet we are subsidized gasoline. Enough of the mentality Third, we hope that all the resolution of the government, give us all free. Reflect on it.

How Many Days Off Work Chest Infection

gasolinazo middle-class teachers Paradoxes

(May 12, 2011) .- Among the personal privileges and scholars who have achieved and I Hector Aguilar Camin over the last year are meeting with members of the SNTE. Since June last year, in every city we visited organized a meeting with an average of 100 teachers, sectional leaders, school principals and supervisors. Many, many thoughts that these encounters lead us. But one has to do with the contrast between the reality of the Mexican master verbalized and socio-economic reality reflected in hard data.

Basically the theme is the same Humberto Moreira posed with his "miserabilist" effective perhaps, but false: Mexico is a country with increasingly poor, with a smaller middle class, and the only way put an end to this situation is to return the PRI to power. Teachers obviously do not share that view, but sometimes expressed equally distorted vision of reality and of the country.

In one case, when we hear yet again the old song of the rural poor primary school teacher who teaches in the shade of a tree in a desert plain, our correspondent asked if he could give us the percentage of primary schools in Mexico that are rural. Responded that about 70 percent: a figure so far from the truth as close to his heart. In fact, if we look at the numbers, the million-plus elementary school teachers of the SNTE are already part of that vast lower middle class to which they referred Luis Rubio and Luis de la Calle, and inspired by the OECD writing them in a book coming out this week: "Tomorrow or the day after. The mystery of the Mexicans" (Aguilar).

The May issue of Nexus, dedicated to education, including an article by Sylvia Ortega Salazar, rector of the National Pedagogical University and former Secretary of Basic Education, which reproduces the findings of a survey conducted in 2010, among teachers. Leave aside the part of the educational views of themselves and teachers as well as data on age, seniority, promotion via the post, and so on. I'll stick with the social.

80 percent of teachers in Mexico have their own home, 63 percent car; Cell 80 percent and 74 percent computer at home, 81 percent internet. In any imaginable sense these are data from an urban middle class with an education level higher than the average Mexican: 75 percent say they have a degree from an institution of higher education dedicated to teacher training (how much the meal is normal schools another story.)

Perhaps the most interesting of all is his self. A staggering 83 percent describes himself as belonging to the middle class. Federico Reyes Heroles had unearthed similar data for Mexican society as a whole, in a survey in 2001 and says in "The Bicentennial Opportunity." He remarked, quite rightly, that in the case of all Mexicans the data is obviously false, and contains more aspirational connotations: 82 percent of Mexicans would be middle class, when a lot today are 56 or 57 by percent.

But in the case of teachers, both higher educational attainment as the socioeconomic realities described in the survey cited in Nexus, it may be that that 83 percent aspirational but not substantive (status who have legitimately won the Over the past 20 years). It is an impressive figure for those who still believe in rural Mexico, poor, illiterate, sick and pre-modern golden age of education Cardenas.

another thing altogether if the education that these teachers taught middle class is what the country needs, deserves and pays. I think not, and I think they have a major responsibility for this failure. But not because they are "the wretched of the earth", but precisely because the middle class. Jorge G.

Castañeda
jorgegcastaneda@gmail.com

++++++++++++++++++++++

Teachers have greatly improved their socioeconomic conditions in the past 15 years along with the rest of Mexico. Today the middle class is more than half of the population. None of this was 20, 30 or 40 years. How sad that the teachers themselves do not recognize the improvement and sold to the highest bidder (political parties, HONEYCOMB, Elba Esther Gordillo) to keep their cushy without improving the educational level of children and youth.

And yet there are those who say we are worse than ever.

Is It Bad To Have Pityriasis Rosea More Than Once

Sams Club

For this season of Mother's Day Sam's Club launched a promotion campaign to pamper moms.

The new catalog coupon is valid from 28 April to 18 May this year. Remember

maximize your coupon discounts for the best this season and pamper your loved one. The store

Sams Club offers the following promotions:

• $ 100 discount on fragrances for women.
• $ 140 discount on ladies' Aura Necklace
• HandBags Emanuel brand
• to $ 399 Save $ 2,000 on an LED display 46''Full HD
• Phone Samsung s5330, full touch QWERTY with discount of $ 600
• Refrigerator 19 ft GE at a discount of $ 900
• Crockery modern square Crown Baccara 24 pieces for $ 50 off
• Save $ 100 on a battery polished Tramontina 15-piece

deals also find many personal items, cleaning and daily use such as shampoo, conditioner, toothpaste, mouthwash, deodorants, creams, pads, diapers, soap, laundry liquid, fabric softener, toilet paper , multipurpose cleaner and many other products.

Honeywell Thermostat Manual

national strategy

you ask who has the required age as to whether the country sees that today is better than 30 or 40 years.
you will see more than you think you are going to say no, three or four decades ago the country was better.
However, those who failed to see Mexico for a long time do not think so.

few days ago talking to a person who worked in our nation in the early 90's and just returned, and I noted that it was impressive the perceived positive change in our country in recent 20.
It is similar with foreign investors. While not failing to recognize the problems that exist in many cases tend to see many advantages in our economy, and the ability of labor or the size of our domestic market, which seldom appreciate locally.

Some examples of long-term differences.

GDP per capita in real terms in 1981, three decades ago, was 69 thousand 174 pesos at 2008 prices. This year is estimated at 84 000 469, which means that today there is a higher income by 22 percent.

But see another relevant indicator.

In 1970, only 6.3 percent of population aged over 15 had completed secondary level or higher. In 2010, this percentage was 35.8 percent, almost six times the proportion of three decades ago.

At the other extreme, 70.5 percent of the population over 15 years was out of school or just complete primary school. That percentage is now 19.8 percent, ie a fall of 71 percent.

The infant mortality rate is one of the most important development indicators. Just in 1990 there were 39.2 deaths within a year per thousand births. This parameter was of 13.7 per thousand last year.

I will not bore you with more indicators but development indicators can be displayed in abundance.
This, of course, does not mean you ignore the 50 percent of poor people in the country, nor the slow growth of the economy over the past two decades.
How can we explain the fact that the face of these developments there is a perception that things have worsened in Mexico?

I think there are two explanations.

One has to do with insecurity. Not only public insecurity, but legal, employment, social relationships, in families, in the future.
Increased insecurity deteriorates our quality of life and makes us believe that the past was better.
The other aspect is about unfulfilled expectations. Beyond the improvements achieved, we have gained a sense of missed opportunities.
Those old enough may remember that in the 90 perceived the possibility of making Mexico a developed nation, which was frustrated by the 1995 crisis and the disaster it caused.
Then, when political change occurred in 2000 also seemed to come a chance to make a big jump, which also was frustrated.

It appears that for years live with that paradox of which we speak, it is not perceived in the short term a real possibility that the country can take that giant leap to convince us that we are now really better.

Enrique Quintana
enrique.quintana @ reforma.com